Sunday, 26 October 2025

Baptism

 

Baptism

Introduction

Not long ago, I was travelling with my eldest son, Alon and we stayed a night in a country town he had previously worked in. The next morning was Sunday, so we went to the local Presbyterian church where he had worshiped during his stay there. There we heard a solid, evangelical sermon, were welcomed by numerous friendly people, and had a great morning tea. As we were walking back to the car, we both commented on what a nice, godly church it was. Being me, I also felt the need to add that, while Heather and I had also worshiped in a Presbyterian church, I had never been able to come to terms with infant baptism.

Alon agreed, and then said, “funny thing, on my first Sunday here, there was an infant baptism. There are actually a lot of Baptists who attend the church, so probably in a real effort not to offend them, the baptism never mentioned the child, but stressed the responsibility of the parents to raise the child in the knowledge of God, and of the church likewise”. At this point, a strange thing happened; my mind was happily thinking what a gracious act, what a kind, thoughtful and generous thing to do, but my spirit burned with anger. Like in Psalm 42:5, I was puzzled by this reaction, and tried to work out why I was feeling so angry.

They were being thoughtful, and going the extra mile so as not to offend, so why was I offended? They were, I reasoned, trying to make baptism inoffensive - and then I understood. It is not in the nature of baptism to be inoffensive. You cannot neuter baptism.

Baptism is about righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. It is about dying to self and being raised from the dead and crowned with glory. It is a statement before God and demons, before the church and society at large, that that which was lost is found, that you have chosen peace with God and thrown down the gauntlet to the world. It is about salvation and eternity, about your name being written in the Lamb’s book of life. It is many things, but it is NOT inoffensive! That was why my spirit burned within me.

So, today I would like to take a look at Baptism, what it is, and what it is not.

 

What it is

A sociologist would tell us that baptism is the Christian initiation rite, its gate-keeper. It identifies to the church and to the world those who are in as opposed to those who are not.

Fair enough as it goes, yet it begs the question, how do you become a Christian?

Acts 2:37-39 brothers, what shall we do? Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."

Acts 16:30-31 He then brought them out and asked, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" They replied, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved--you and your household."

John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

Romans 10:9-11 That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved.

1Peter 1:9 As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame." for you are receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls.

John 3:3 In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again. "

We become Christians by being saved, by being born again. And what is our part in this process? We need to believe, and to repent, Here God meets us, we are joined with Jesus, given new, eternal life in him, clothed with his righteousness, filled with his spirit.

Baptism is a dramatic re-enactment of our salvation. Baptism proclaims this inward transformation, this journey from death to life, so others can understand and be blessed.

Romans 6:1 What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?

2 By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? 3 Or don't you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. 5 If we have been united with him like this in his death, we will certainly also be united with him in his resurrection. 6 For we know that our old self was crucified with him so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin--

7 because anyone who has died has been freed from sin. 8 Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. 9 For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him. 10 The death he died, he died to sin once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God. 11 In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus.

This is baptism! You go under the waters, dying to self. Here, you are united with Christ in his death, and united with him is his resurrection – you are re-born and raised to new life in him! Note also that this passage is NOT about baptism! It is teaching about salvation, and uses baptismal language to do so, because that is what baptism is, a dramatization of salvation!

Colossians 2:12 having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.

Colossians 3:1 Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God. 2 Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things. 3 For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God.

Romans 8:11 And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.

Galatians 2:19-20 For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.

1Peter 3:21 and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also--not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,

So, we have died to what we want, and now live for Jesus and through Jesus. Indeed, if you were to take the symbolism of baptism a little too seriously, if Jesus has not been raised, then we would just float about at the bottom of the baptismal pool, with everyone growing increasingly nervous and concerned. But, praise God, Jesus has been raised, and we see the young person bursting up out of the waters, full of joy and showing everyone they now belong to him.

 

Baptism is the public witness that you have become a follower of Jesus. It is an amazing preaching of the good news to others. I have been at several open air baptisms, one in a waddi in Israel, and people wandering through were naturally interested, and asking questions about what was happening. “See that person, well, they are going under the water, showing they are dying to their own desires, and now they are coming back up, because they want to live for Jesus.” And the joy of the Lord was just beaming through them.

The final part of our definition of what baptism is, is that baptism is a commandment.

Matthew 28:19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

Mark 16:15-16 He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.

16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.

Jesus commands that we tell others the good news, and baptism is our first act of obedience to that command. Saying it is a command might make it sound like a burden, but anyone who has seen a baptism knows this is not true. God’s commands are for our blessing, and for the blessing of others, and in baptism we see the truth in the verse; “I delight to do your will.”

So, baptism is the Christian initiation ceremony, it is a dramatic re-enactment of that salvation, it is a public proclamation that we are saved, and witnesses as to how to be saved, it is a commandment of our Lord, and it is an absolute joy.

 

With all that good stuff in mind, lets now look briefly at a few of the questions that are often asked about baptism. These can be summarized as;

Must I get baptized?

When should I get baptized?

How should I get baptized?

Who should get baptized?

 

Must I get baptized?

This tends to be one of those odd questions where people come up with bizarre scenarios, and then want a general ruling on the basis of them. So, the answer is a provisional no. If circumstances make it impossible to be baptized, God wont send you to hell. God loves us, he wants to save us, he died to save us. He does not tell the thief on the cross (the favorite bizarre scenario), if only you could now get baptized, you could be with me, no! God knows our circumstances, and judges rightly and with mercy.

However, if like almost everyone, you are able to get baptized, but just didn’t want to, then that would be a real problem. You cant decide to follow Jesus, then refuse his first command on your life. In that case, you would have to doubt the genuineness of their salvation.

John 14:15 If you love me, you will obey what I command.

1John 2: 4 The man who says, "I know him," but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

Remember, baptism is something those who are saved want to do and delight in.

Also, baptism does not save us – it is something we do because we are saved. It is however totally ties up with our salvation, and, as said, re-enacts that salvation. Acts 2:41 Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day.

 

When should I get baptized?

Baptism is the celebration of our salvation, and it should naturally occur as soon as you are saved.

Acts 2:41 Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to

their number that day.

Acts 8:12 But when they believed Philip as he preached the good news of the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

Acts 8:35-36 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus. 36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, "Look, here is water. Why shouldn't I be baptized?"

Acts 18:8 Crispus, the synagogue ruler, and his entire household believed in the Lord; and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptized.

 

How should I get baptized?

The two options here are by full immersion, and by sprinkling. As we have seen, full immersion, the going under the water as dying to self, and then being raised up to new life in Jesus, beautifully and fully reflects what it is meant to symbolize. On the basis of Romans 6 alone we would prefer it. None of this wonderful symbolism is found in sprinkling. Hebrews 10 indeed has us sprinkled with the blood, and washed in pure water. The New Testament also draws several Old Testament allusions to baptism; 1 Peter 3:20 links it with the noahic flood – an escape from the judgement on all flesh to new life, while 1 Corinthians 10 sees it in the journey through the Red Sea – slavery on one side, new life and freedom on the other. Both are images of immersion by vast amounts of water.

 

There are also other reasons to choose it.

 

Baptism was already practiced within Jewish society before the New Testament. The early church did not invent it – rather, under God’s grace, they showed it fullest meaning. Within Judaism, purification rituals were a big deal (see John 2:6). Jewish baptism was by full immersion, this requirement being basic to the design of the baptismal pools, or mikvahs that archeologists are continually uncovering all over Israel from this time. Complete immersion was very important. Before entering the mikvah, women would brush their hair, so that each strand would be washed, and even today, there are conflicting rulings concerning the appropriate management of dreadlocks. The Temple in Jerusalem had many ritual immersion baths connected to it, including over 48 on the ceremonial steps of the complex alone. Herod indeed had nearly 90 kms of aqueducts built to make sure there was always enough water for them. The Temple was well able to cope with the baptismal needs of the tens of thousands who visited during the Holy Days, and so the baptism of 3,000 on the first day of Pentecost would have provided no logistical difficulties.

 

Baptism by full immersion is not only the symbolism of the New Testament, it is also its practice;

Mark 1:9-10 At that time Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. 10 As Jesus was coming up out of the water,

John 3:23 Now John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because there was plenty of water,

Acts 8:36 As they travelled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, "Look, here is water. Why shouldn't I be baptized?" … 39 When they came up out of the water,

 

None of these passages would be necessary if baptism did not require a significant amount of water. So, the teaching and the practice of the New Testament are in agreement, and these combine with the preparation from the Old Testament to make full immersion the way to go.

I well remember my own baptism, and as I was one of a number getting baptized that day, I noticed that the person ahead of me did not go fully under the water. Now, I know it is only a symbol, but I remember thinking, I don’t want any part of me not to die to self, I want to belong fully to Jesus, and I remember pushing myself way down as the pastor was doing it.

Unless completely impossible, it is a requirement of all believers. It should be done by full immersion, and to adults who have made a public declaration of their faith in Jesus. Finally, there is the divisive question of who?

Who should get baptized?

Who is a fit subject for baptism? This question is answered by our definition of baptism. What is it? It is the sign of our salvation. The link between baptism and salvation is absolute;

1Peter 3:21 water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also--not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,

Acts 2:38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Acts 2:41 Those who accepted his message were baptized,

Acts 8:12-13 But when they believed Philip as he preached the good news of the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women., Simon himself believed and was baptized.

Acts 18:8 and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptized.

Now, if the link between baptism and salvation is absolute, the question then is, how are we saved?

 

As seen, the answers revolve around repentance, believing, faith, confession.

Romans 10:10-11 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. 11 As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame."

 

So, baptism is for those who have repented and believed, for those who have died to self and been born again into the kingdom of God. For those who, by faith, have trusted in Jesus. It perfectly and beautifully describes and proclaims what has happened to a person who has become a Christian.

 

No one disputes this. The question is, what about babies?

 

Well, do babies repent? Do they confess their sins and ask God to forgive them? Have they trusted in Jesus? Baptism does not rightly describe a one week old baby’s life experience or spiritual journey. They are not suitable candidates for baptism. They have been born, they have not been born again. Baptism is profoundly damaged if it is applied to them. Remember, baptism is a public teaching and witness to salvation. The teaching and proclaiming of salvation is a big deal to the church – to get that wrong is likewise a big deal. Infant baptism fails the church in three ways;

 

1.      The church’s witness to outsiders is corrupted – being invited to watch a baby get water sprinkled on them does not teach them about salvation, yet it may be the only time the go to church. We are commanded to preach salvation to the nations, a salvation that is by faith and belief, not one by ritual and genealogy. This is a big deal.

      2. The church’s witness to its own membership is corrupted. How often do you hear someone say; “I am a Christian, I was baptized as a baby.” They have been badly misled by a false ceremony within a church so they do not understand their desperate need for faith, repentance, and new birth in Jesus, without which no one will see God. Baptism is indeed related to salvation, and they misunderstand salvation because their church has misinformed them. This is a big deal.

       3. Christians within such a church are denied the ability to obey this command of Jesus. Infant baptism also robs such children of the blessing of true baptism. They never get to testify to their personal faith in this wonderful way, they never get to obey this command of Jesus. That they would have to leave their own church to obey a command of Jesus is a terrible indictment. This is a big deal.

 

Those who argue for infant baptism argue from a very weak position. Infant baptism is neither taught nor practiced in the New Testament.

 

Regards to teaching, it is claimed that circumcision was given to babies in the Old Testament, so baptism should be given to babies. That is to completely misunderstand the nature of the New Covenant, however.

 

John 3:3-8 In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again. " "How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!" Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.' The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit."

 

Baptism is not about physical birth, but is all about being born of the Spirit. This is when we become the children of God, spiritual babies.

1Peter 2:2 Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation,

Baptism is about being born again.

1Peter 1:21-23 Through him you believe in God, who raised him from the dead and glorified him, and so your faith and hope are in God. Now that you have purified yourselves by obeying the truth so that you have sincere love for your brothers, love one another deeply, from the heart. For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God.

 

This is not about physical birth (via perishable seed), but the Word of God!

 

1John 3:9-10 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God. 10 This is how we know who the children of God

1John 5:1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God,

1John 5:4-5 for everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.

 

New birth involves believing. Now, there is indeed a link between circumcision and baptism, as entrances into God’s people, but it is applied to the new birth – to those who by their faith in Jesus have been made alive with him, as illustrated by baptism. This does not apply baptism to circumcision, but relates circumcision to baptism.

 

Colossians 2:11-13 In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ,

having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead. When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins,

 

Unless a baby has been raised with Jesus through the power of that babies’ own faith, then this verse does not apply to babies. The linkage with circumcision is explicitly made in the New Testament, but in such a way as to prohibit it being used to justify infant baptism. Baptism re-enacts a person’s faith journey, therefore one must have faith to be baptized.

Lastly, what about 1Corinthians 7:14? “For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy”.

 

Paul is talking about the situation of believers who have unbelieving spouses. Paul says that the unbelieving, unbaptized spouse has a sanctifying covering due to the marriage bond (a new question requiring a new answer), and then backs this up with reference to the (uncontroversial and already understood) state of their own children; the unbelieving, unbaptized spouse has a sanctifying just as your children (though likewise unbelieving and unbaptized) are also covered by God’s grace. Now, if those children had been saved and baptized, then their status would be the same as the rest of the community, and in no way analogous to the unbelieving spouse. Note that Paul also accepts the possibility that the still unbelieving spouse may decide to leave, that is, the sanctification imparted by the marriage does not as such save them or make them a candidate for baptism. He hopes that they will come to be saved (verse 16), but there is no guarantee, or impartation of that status in the meantime - see 1 Peter 3:1 for a similar thought (1 Peter 3:1 Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they see the purity and reverence of your lives). While the unbelieving spouse is with the believing one, they are blessed in that they are able to see up close the gospel in action, but they must still act on that if they are to be saved. Just as your own children are also blessed by being raised in a Christian home, but will also have to make their own decision for Christ as they reach the age of understanding. Again, if the children of believers were saved, and therefore fit candidates for baptism, then Paul could not compare their state to the situation of an unbelieving unbaptized spouse.

Turning finally to New Testament practice – did Jesus or the apostles baptize babies? If so, then it is Biblical, if not, then it is neither taught nor practiced in the Bible.

Because there are no explicit examples of children being baptized, (Jesus himself blessed the little children, he did not baptize them) the argument descends to one about the composition of households, and were children therefore included when we are told that someone and his entire household were baptized. Fortunately, this argument does not depend on the various usages of the Greek work oikos in Koine Greek.

 

The relevant passages in mainly in Acts, and are wonderful examples of Romans 10:13-14;

for, "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." 14 How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them?

In these accounts, they all gather to hear the preached word, they all believe, and then they are all baptized. In the house of Cornelius, all were devout and God fearing, in the household of Crispus, all believed and were baptized. After receiving the Spirit, they then all speak in tongues and praise God. Two of the accounts are shorter, but are in harmony with the rest. To read into the shorter versions something not in the text, but rather in direct contradiction to the longer accounts (and in direct contradiction to the unanimous teaching re salvation throughout the New Testament), would be indefensible.

There is nothing of infant baptism in these accounts.

Cornelius (Acts 10) Lydia

(Acts 16) Jailer

(Acts 16) Crispus

(Acts 18) Stephanas

(1 Corinthians 1)

He and all his household were devout and God-fearing; (Acts 10:2)

He will bring you a message through which you and all your household will be saved.' (Acts 11:14) and asked, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?"

31 They replied, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved--you and your household."

(Acts 16:30-31)

Now we are all here in the presence of God to listen to everything the Lord has commanded you to tell us." (Acts 10:33)

We sat down and began to speak to the women who had gathered there.

(Acts 16:13) Then they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all the others in his house. (Acts 16:32) Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks…

Paul devoted himself exclusively to preaching, testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ.

(Acts 18:4-5)

the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. (Acts 10:44) The Lord opened her heart to respond to Paul's message. (Acts 16:14) then immediately he and all his family were baptized. (Acts 16:33 ) Crispus, the synagogue ruler, and his entire household believed in the Lord; (Acts 18:8)

they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. Then Peter said,

47 "Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? (Acts 10:46-47) When she and the members of her household were baptized, she invited us to her home. (Acts 16:15) he was filled with joy because he had come to believe in God--he and his whole household. (Acts 16:34) and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptized. (Acts 18:8) I also baptized the household of Stephanas (1Corinthians 1:16)

they went to Lydia's house, where they met with the brothers and encouraged them. (Acts 16:40) You know that the household of Stephanas were the first converts in Achaia, and they have devoted themselves to the service of the saints. (1Corinthians 16:15)

 

To conclude, baptism is fantastic!

It is a public proclamation that we are saved, and witnesses as to how to be saved. It is a commandment of our Lord, and it is an absolute joy. It is available to all who hear and believe. Unless completely impossible, it is a requirement of all believers, and should be done by full immersion to adults who have made a public declaration of their faith.

It blesses the Lord, it blesses the person undergoing it, it blesses God’s people and it blesses others who see it. God’s commands are a delight, and we are right to praise him for them.

Thursday, 17 July 2025

Nick Fuentes, Yishai Fleisher and the destruction of the Temple in 70AD.

 

Recently, Yishai Fleisher hosted a discussion with Rabbi Elie Mischel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtTuhpaj2x0) which started with a discussion of the views of Nick Fuentes on the destruction of the Temple in 70AD. Below is the letter I posted as part of that discussion. It is based on the much longer blog-post, https://colinbarnesblog.blogspot.com/2021/08/jesus-and-jewish-history-quickre-cap-we.html


Dear Yishai Fleisher,

Thank you for a fascinating discussion! As one of those Christians who love Israel, there was much here I could joyfully affirm. The discussion about the views of Nick Fuentes was excellent. Rabbi Elie Mischel rightly said the charge by Mr Fuentes that Jesus “destroyed the Temple” was false! This is completely correct. As the Rabbi says, ““Jesus never came to abolish the temple. … Paul worshipped in the Temple.”

There are indeed several places in the New Testament where opponents of Jesus and his followers make this charge, and in every case, the New Testament records them as “false accusations.” Mr Fuentes has clearly got his facts wrong here! The origin of this false charge is found in John 2:13-19 “When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found men selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said, ‘Get these out of here! How dare you turn my Father's house into a market!’ His disciples remembered that it is written: ‘Zeal for your house will consume me.’ Then the Jews demanded of him, ‘What miraculous sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?’ Jesus answered them, ‘Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.’"

Note that the Pharisees also found the prices charged in the Temple to be an affront. See Mishna Keriot 1:7. “There was an incident where the price of nests, i.e., pairs of birds, stood in Jerusalem at one gold dinar, as the great demand for birds for the offerings of a woman after childbirth and a zava led to an increase in the price. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: I swear by this abode of the Divine Presence that I will not lie down tonight until the price of nests will be in silver dinars. Ultimately, he entered the court and taught: A woman who has in her case five definite discharges of a zava or five definite births brings one offering, and then she may partake of the meat of offerings. And the remaining offerings are not an obligation for her. And as a result, the price of the nests stood that day at one-quarter of a silver dinar, as the demand for nests decreased.” Mishna Keriot 1:7.

So in this case, the Pharisees would presumably have sided with Jesus against the Sadducees’ administration of the Temple, (as they would side with Paul against them in Acts 23:6-9).

In any event, Jesus goes to the Temple, sees what a disgrace it has become, is overcome with zeal for God’s house (because he loves it), he cleanses it. When asked for a sign to show by what authority he did this, re replies; "[you] Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." The word “destroy” here is in second person plural! Having seen the state it is in, Jesus is in effect accusing them of destroying it! He was not destroying it, rather out of zeal for it, he was cleansing it. They were the ones destroying the Temple. Jesus then goes further, and alludes to his own mission as being to restore the Temple once it has fallen. This is a very important point, and an active bone of contention in New Testament times, where both Luke and Mark go out of their way to brand as false the then present accusations that Jesus had said that he would destroy the Temple. 

Mark 14:57-58 And some stood up and began to give false testimony against Him, saying, 58 "We heard Him say, 'I (singular in the Greek) will destroy this temple made with hands, and in three days I will build another made without hands.'" 

Acts 6:13-14 And they put forward false witnesses who said, "This man incessantly speaks against this holy place, and the Law; 14 for we have heard him say that this Nazarene, Jesus, will destroy this place." (See also Paul, Acts 25:8 Then Paul made his defence: "I have done nothing wrong against the law of the Jews or against the temple.”)

 As a Christian, I believe that Jesus came not to judge, but to bring life (John 12:47-50). Like the angels going to Sodom and Gomorrah, he was on a rescue mission to a doomed city, to offer a way out to all who would follow him.

In the Talmud, four signs are recorded as occurring in the Temple which showed that its destruction was inevitable. While the time these signs began is a little vague, 40 years being a generic phrase, it does date them to the time Jesus went beyond the city gates, and was crucified;

Yoma 39b “Our Rabbis taught: During the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple the lot [‘For the Lord’] did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson-coloured strap become white; nor did the westernmost light shine; and the doors of the Temple [to the Holy place] would open of their own accord. Then R. Johanan b. Zakkai rebuked them, saying: Temple, Temple, why do you alarm yourself [Predict thy own destruction]? I know about you that you will be destroyed, for Zechariah ben Ido [11:1] has already prophesied concerning you [I.e., concerning this significant omen of the destruction of the Temple]: Open your doors, O Lebanon, that a fire may devour you cedars. R. Isaac b. Tablai said: Why is its name called Lebanon? Because it makes white the sins of Israel ...” [The Sanctuary. A play on לְבָנוֹן, connected with לְבָנ]

The first two signs concern the sacrifice on the Day of Atonement. The lot was for the two goats of the sin offering. Leviticus 16:7-10 details the placing of the lots. That the lot “for the Lord” did not come up in the right hand for 40 years in a row was seen as inexplicable, and a sign of God’s displeasure. The scarlet thread was tied both to the second goat and also to the door of the Temple on the outside; “as it has been taught: ‘Originally they used to fasten the thread of scarlet on the door of the [Temple] court on the outside. If it turned white the people used to rejoice, and if it did not turn white they were sad. They therefore made a rule that it should be fastened to the door of the court on the inside. People, however, still peeped in and saw, and if it turned white they rejoiced and if it did not turn white they were sad. They therefore made a rule that half of it should be fastened to the rock and half between the horns of the goat that was sent [to the wilderness]’... and it has further been taught: ‘For forty years before the destruction of the Temple the thread of scarlet never turned white but it remained red’” Rosh HaShana 31b The most important sacrifice of the year, for the sins of the people and the nation, was rejected by God! 

The third sign concerned the westernmost light; “The westernmost light on the candlestick in the Temple, into which as much oil was put as into the others. Although all the other lights were extinguished, that light buried oil, in spite of the fact that it had been kindled first. This miracle was taken as a sign that the Shechinah rested over Israel. V. Shab. 22b and Men. 86b.” Soncino Commentary, Yoma 39a. RaSHI also states that the above events were signs that the Shechina, the Holy Spirit, was leaving the Temple.

The fourth sign was that the door of the Holy Place opening of its own accord; Josephus in Wars, 6:5:3 records a similar omen when the massive brass eastern gate of the Temple’s inner court, which was so heavy it needed twenty men to move it each evening, and though securely locked by iron bolts, opened by itself in the middle of the night, at the sixth hour. The Temple guards ran and reported the matter to the Captain, and he came up and by strenuous efforts managed to close it. Something very similar is recorded in three of the Gospels; looking at the record of Luke, Luke 23:44-46 It was now about the sixth hour, and darkness came over the whole land until the ninth hour, 45 for the sun stopped shining. And the curtain of the temple was torn in two. 46 Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last. 

If we put these accounts together, we find they testify to the departure of the Holy Spirit from the Temple, as recorded in Ezekiel. Luke has the departure from the Holy of Holies, the Talmud the departure from the Holy Place (the Hekal), and Josephus the departure from the Eastern Gate.

Ezekiel 9:3 “Now the glory of the God of Israel went up from above the cherubim [in the Holy of Holies], where it had been, and moved to the threshold of the temple.” Ezekiel 10:18 “Then the glory of the LORD departed from over the threshold of the temple” Ezekiel 10:19 “They stopped at the entrance to the east gate of the LORD's house, and the glory of the God of Israel was above them.” Ezekiel 11:23 The glory of the LORD went up from within the city and stopped above the mountain east of it. Hebrews 8:13 “By calling this covenant ‘new,’ he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.” 

[Jesus will in fact re-trace these steps when he returns to the Temple, descending firstly upon the Mt of Olives, then entering through the Eastern gate; Psalm 24:7-10 Lift up your heads, O you gates; be lifted up, you ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in. 8 Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and mighty, the LORD mighty in battle. 9 Lift up your heads, O you gates; lift them up, you ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in. 10 Who is he, this King of glory? The LORD Almighty-- he is the King of glory. Selah”] 

Thank you again for what you shared,

God bless,

Colin